Thursday, March 29, 2007

Sir Martin Sorrell (3)

Posted this about Sir Martin recently.

And the defamation case in which Sir Martin was awarded £100000 in damages finished yesterday and for some reason today's Times Online appears to have a bit of a dig. Is it their general view about these types of cases, or the huge legal bills that both sides will have to cough up?

2 comments:

james higham said...

What was it about, Jeremy? Or is that sub judice?

Jeremy Jacobs said...

no not at all. Details of the case are at the Times.