Sir Martin Sorrell (3)
Posted this about Sir Martin recently.
And the defamation case in which Sir Martin was awarded £100000 in damages finished yesterday and for some reason today's Times Online appears to have a bit of a dig. Is it their general view about these types of cases, or the huge legal bills that both sides will have to cough up?
2 comments:
What was it about, Jeremy? Or is that sub judice?
no not at all. Details of the case are at the Times.
Post a Comment