Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

Alan Caruba's latest...................


The Really Big Picture

Imagine yourself as a winged creature, free to fly, free to soar above the Earth, moving effortlessly from continent to continent, to hover over great cities and tiny villages, crossing oceans, crossing deserts, visiting the North and South Poles. That would be the really big picture, wouldn’t it?

If you could do that, what would you see? For one thing you’d see a planet with an astonishing population of six billion human beings, more than at any other time in history.

For them, it is not a clash of economic systems that matters, but having enough money to pay for food, having a clean place in which to live, and having a life that involves family. Rich or poor, in most of the world television shows them what others have. What they want, however, is their own definition of comfort.

The world, however, is unfair. In wealthy westernized nations, most people havean astonishing level of comfort, but there are the poor, the homeless, and the less fortunate for whatever reason. Frequently the reason is a high level of corruption endemic to their society and/or government.

In places like the African and Asian continent, masses of the population live in an unimaginable poverty, often in nations that are resource-rich, but run by horrid people. What they have are a family and a tribe. There are often invisible barriers to everything beyond that. Family and tribe also describe much of the Middle East as well.

Mostly, though, as you soar above the world, despite the disease and poverty, there is peace. An astounding amount of peace exists throughout the world. What "wars" exist are relatively low-key affairs. While Americans debate their military presence in Iraq, obsessed with daily events there and eager to leave the Middle East, much of that nation functions without bloodshed.

When you circle the region, it is clear that the "wars" in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon are relatively small, individual firefights, not massive armies moving back and forth across the terrain. The weapon of choice is the individual suicide bomber. They are surrounded by neighbor states free of warfare.

When you fly in wider circles, the war that transfixes the news in America recedes as one goes in any direction. Look down and see Turkey is at peace. Europe is at peace. Russia is at peace. China is at peace. India is at peace. Southeast Asia, Australia, and, crossing the Pacific, the whole of South America is at peace.

Where are the wars? In terms of how war was once defined there are none.

My generation grew up in a world at war. America put massive armies, navies and air forces in Europe and in the Pacific. Not just whole cities, but whole continents saw destruction on a scale never experienced in history. Then, one day after two bombs had obliterated Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war was over.

Despite being weary, America threw itself into another war within a few years, seeking to protect South Korea from communist dictatorship. Nearly 37,000 men died in that war. From 1945 to 1989, the nation fought a "Cold War" with a Soviet empire whose only legacy is the millions it enslaved and killed. For seven years during that time, we sacrificed the lives of over 57,000 more Americans in a tiny nation called Vietnam though few recall why anymore.

That was what a world at war looked like during much of the last century. Massed armies. Massive destruction. Death for civilian and soldier alike calculated in the thousands and the hundreds of thousands.

Today, there are no massed armies facing each other on vast battlefields. There are only blustering men urging people to die for the promise of a paradise they cannot deliver on Earth. They cannot deliver enough food. They cannot deliver a thriving economy. They cannot deliver a better life.

These few sad, mad people cannot defeat the West unless we utterly lose the will not just to fight them, but also to annihilate them. We are perilously close to no longer even wanting to fight them!

They cannot defeat the sweep and flow of global trade the likes of which no one could imagine a score of years ago. They cannot defeat the spread of knowledge, of the awareness that out there, beyond family, beyond the tribe, there are places of amazing wealth and, for those willing to work for it, the opportunity to have some of it.

There is no need to cower in the face of "terrorist" videos showing an old man dressed in the garb of the seventh century. Understand that this old man and the young ones he has recruited are a pathetic enemy, an army of lost hopes, and no future. Must they be defeated? Yes. The waging of war in our times is a terribly costly enterprise. The failure to wage war, however, will come with an even higher price, our freedom.

What few Americans grasp is that the greatest export of the United States is protection. We protect the vital sea lanes of the world so commerce can safely move goods around, so natural resources for energy and everything else can reach their destinations. We protect our allies against the threats of their neighbors. We project power because, in a dangerous world, it is the only thing that insures peace.

The world is mostly at peace, but as an ancient sage once said, "Si vis pacem, para bellum." If you want peace, plan for war.

We can do that. We can prevail. We can and should plan for peace. It’s breaking out all over the world.


Do you agree with Alan's article, or is your view of the world different?

Democracy, lies and politicians

On Sunday evening many of you would have seen the BBC2 programme about Freedom. Worrying stuff indeed.
Yesterday morning on BBC Radio 4, I heard David Cameron use those immortal words, "we must change peoples habits" (sounds more like the dictator Blair every day) and a little earlier I had to endure that snivelling, nauseating twirp called Milliband trying to justify his green anti-capitalist stupidity with John Humphreys. I think this below from "Big Brother" in Canada sums things up.


We are having an election here right now and the politicians are making promises right, left and center. Promises that everyone knows they will never keep. (and politicians wonder why they are about as popular as a dose of clap) So to make things a little less cynical, or maybe to prove I ain't the only cynic here, here are some quotes on the the subject of democracy.

  • Democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time. WINSTON CHURCHILL, speech, Nov. 11, 1947
  • Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
  • Democracy consists of choosing your dictators, after they've told you what you think it is you want to hear, ALAN COREN
  • Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people. OSCAR WILDE, The Soul of Man Under Socialism
  • It's not the voting that's democracy; it's the counting. TOM STOPPARD, Jumpers (Ah those hangin' chads and electronic voting machines)
  • Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right. H.L. MENCKEN
  • The ballot is stronger than the bullet. ABRAHAM LINCOLN, speech, May 19, 1856
  • The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter. WINSTON CHURCHILL
  • Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. GEORGE BERNARD SHAW, Maxims for Revolutionists
  • It is a besetting vice of democracies to substitute public opinion for law. This is the usual form in which masses of men exhibit their tyranny. JAMES FENIMORE COOPER, The American Democrat
  • Democracy becomes a government of bullies tempered by editors. RALPH WALDO EMERSON
  • In every well-governed state, wealth is a sacred thing; in democracies it is the only sacred thing. ANATOLE FRANCE, Penguin Island
  • The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference, and undernourishment. ROBERT HUTCHINS
  • Democracy is the recurrent suspicion that more than half of the people are right more than half the time. E.B. WHITE
  • Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. H.L. MENCKEN
  • Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats. We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee. HELEN KELLER (a very wise woman)
  • Democracy is when the indigent, and not the men of property, are the rulers. ARISTOTLE
  • Democracy is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequal alike. PLATO
  • Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage. H.L. MENCKEN
  • Democracy is the road to socialism. KARL MARX


  • I love the last one!

    Wednesday, February 07, 2007

    Are the citizens striking back?

    I have gone on record in saying that we are closer now to widespread civil disobedience in Britain, than we have been for over a century and a half.

    Whilst I don't condone the sending of letter bombs to those in authority, I can understand why some people would be motivated to do so. We are living in unprecedented times. Never before have we been spied upon so much, taxed, fined, patronized and treated in contempt by the state. Our justice system seems all to ready to hound those who drive at 35 mph in a 30mph zone, whilst paedophiles, robbers and other degenerates seem to get off lightly.

    The Blair regime may have caused some, who prize personal freedom and libertarian values highly, to start taking extra-parliamentary action. They probably feel disaffected by the whole political process, uninspired by Her Majesty's Opposition and generally disenchanted by the "police" state we appear to living in.

    Are citizens striking back?

    What's your opinion?

    Tuesday, January 30, 2007

    "Blogroll" updates

    Apart from the hilarious Welshman, Chip 'n Dale, I've also added ATW, or A Tangled Web. This site is well written by David Vance and his team. A rising star, I feel.

    Another thought provoking site is Tim Kevan's clever Barrister Blog

    Finally, I just love Drunken Blogging



    P.S. I nearly forgot Tim Kevan's fiancee - Michelle Tempest and her Psychiatrist Blog

    Tuesday, January 23, 2007

    BBC - Big Brother Corporation?

    This morning on BBC Radio 4, I heard a snippet from Paul Dacre's speech at the London College of Communication which he delivered last night. His comments, and apparently most of his speech content, really struck a nerve. I'm sure I speak for many people in this country who are fed to the back teeth with the left-wing, liberal, PC attitude of our national broadcaster. The behemoth, as Dacre described the BBC, has always, in my opinion, supported the left but I feel that nowadays it comes across as the "Party broadcaster" and wo betide those who dare to criticize it.

    Paul Dacre may have slightly off beam as Roy Greenslade points out in his article but I agree with the Dacre's general gist. He expressed concern for smaller broadcasters and their independent voice and coined the term "subsidiarat". This term is reserved for media giants, the BBC just being one, who by definition, are unable to survive in a free-market" as Dacre suggested.

    Subsidiarat is a word we'll hear more of in the future.


    How do you fell about Dacre's remarks?

    Do you share his concern?

    Is the BBC the behemoth hbe descibes them as?

    Monday, January 01, 2007

    Mainstream Media Watchout?

    We all know that the Blogosphere likes to expose the twisted truths that eminate from the mainstream media.
    Things may have shifted up a gear. Just seen this on LGF.

    Tuesday, December 26, 2006

    "The Russians are coming"

    Alan Caruba highlights in his latest article how Russia still spies on the USA.

    The Russians Have Never Stopped Spying on Us

    It is not for nothing that Vladimir Putin, the president of the Russian Republic, is a former member of the KGB. From its earliest days, Soviet Russia maintained a vast army of spies around the world and penetrating the United States remained high on its list of priorities.

    In 2001, the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Robert Hanssen, a FBI special agent who was a Russian spy, judged to be one of the most damaging moles in U.S. history. As Bill Gertz, a Washington Times reporter, notes in his latest book, "Enemies: How America’s Foes Steal Our Vital Secrets—and How We Let It Happen", "Today, nearly 140 nations and some 35 known and suspected terrorist groups target the United States through espionage, according to intelligence officials."

    "Over the past several decades, foreign agents have penetrated every U.S. national security agency except the Coast Guard. That includes the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Defense Department, the State Department, and the Energy Department."

    My thoughts turned to espionage as the saga of the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, a former member of the KGB’s counterintelligence now known as the Federal Security Service (FSB) unfolded. In 2000, he had fled with his wife and son to Great Britain where he was granted asylum. He became an author and outspoken critic of the Putin regime.

    Silencing the enemies of Russian ambitions has a very long history including the famed ghulags of the Stalinist era.

    Americans these days are prone to worry about whether the government is listening into their phone conversations, despite repeated confirmations that the National Security Agency is listening to calls from overseas to suspected Islamic terrorists located here. The notion that everyone’s phone calls are being monitored is fairly idiotic given the volume and the utter waste of resources with which to spy on Americans who pose no threat of terrorism.

    There was a bit of a flurry of outrage over recent remarks by Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House, who suggested that listening in on our enemies, particularly those here in America, was a good idea since they intended to kill us all. Common sense like that always gets liberals atwitter. As some sage noted, the First Amendment is not a suicide pact.

    Some lunatic Muslim convert, seized with "Instant Jihad Syndrome", was recently arrested by FBI agents after he confided to informants that he intended to kill a lot of people while they did some Christmas shopping in a mall. Kudos to the FBI.

    However, Gertz notes that "The FBI has continually resisted efforts to change, even in the aftermath of the Hanssen case and the September 11 attacks. The need for change applies at all levels, from high-level officials to agents in the field." This is not good news. Indeed, Gertz asserts that, "The FBI has failed to protect its people, its secrets, and U.S. national security."

    "Enemies" devotes an entire chapter to "Russia’s Aggressive Espionage" and this included planting a spy in the U.S. Central Command’s warfighting headquarters in Doha, Qatar, where he transmitted the details of the 2003 invasion plans to his controllers who, in turn, gave them to Saddam Hussein.

    The two most devastating spy cases in recent times involved Robert Hanssen and Aldrich Ames, both Americans and both of whom were spying for Russia. According to Gertz, "There are as many Russian spies in the United States today as there were during the Cold War." The book also documents Red China’s successful espionage program. ( but where does Gertz get his information?)

    There is, in fact, no good news in Gertz’s book. "The CIA’s once-proud Directorate of Operations has been decimated by retirements and low morale. By 2005, the agency had fewer than 1,000 case officers in the field. Many CIA stations had been reduced to single CIA officers who acted as little more than liaison officers with local services."

    On the cusp of 2007, this should signal why we probably do not know what Iran is up do. Or North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and a laundry list of nations and non-state groups like al Qaeda that would like to see the greatest experiment in democracy and capitalism come to a nasty end.

    (I would have thought that the USA has invested in technology, which, in some cases, may obviate the need for personnel)

    And, finally, Americans have just put the power of Congress into the hands of a group of people who would much rather "talk" to our enemies than kill them. Our enemies have no such qualms. As easily as they would kill Alexander Litvinenko, we can look forward to more efforts to encourage America to self-destruct.

    (Who knows the real reason behind the death of Litvinenko)

    The ancient Chinese military strategist, Sun Tzu, long ago wrote that the greatest skill in war is to defeat of one’s enemy without firing a shot.

    The Center needs your support and will appreciate your donation to help maintain our communications program. If you prefer, send your check or money order to The Caruba Organization, 28 West Third Street, Suite 1321, South Orange, NJ 07079. Thank you!

    Friday, December 22, 2006

    What are the seven [7] best things you did this past year?

    From James Higham........and these are mine

    1] Bought a new computer and started blogging.
    2] Agreed to trek in Feb 2007 for Breast Cancer Campaign (see my other blog)
    3] Got involved in Blogpower with many of you.
    4] Moved up the "meedja" ladder.
    5] Didn't get another 3 points on my licence.
    6] Had a fantastic weekend in Bordeaux in October and survived the Pyrennes in June!
    7] Glad I didn't go to the World Cup.

    Tags:
    Eastcliffe Richard
    Frances Oapen
    Dr Simon Moores
    Lucy Mail/Ramsgate Tourettes
    Julia Buckley
    Sashinka
    Stephen Pollard
    Tim Worstall
    JohnnyB
    Ellee Seymour
    Barrybeelzebub
    Pillage Idiot
    Peter Wells' Coffin End Blog
    Men are better than women
    Onyx Stone
    Chase me
    Michelle Malkin
    Adelaide Green Porridge Cafe
    Gates of Vienna
    Bel is thinking
    The Spine
    Strumpette
    Petite Anglaise

    Thursday, December 14, 2006

    Post Office closures.

    Taken from the UKIP website

    Lost in the post?

    14-12-2006
    The government was accused today of covering up the true reason why thousands of British post offices have been, or will be, closed.
    In spite of all their explanations, they have not revealed the true reason behind the closures.

    "The plain truth is that the scandal of these closures is directly because of a ruling from the European Commission.

    UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage added, "Three years ago, this government signed away the Royal Mail's ability to conduct its own financial affairs."

    The deal struck in 2003 allowed the government to provide £150 million a year to the post office, which has been extended by another three years. However, the costs of subsidising the service cost £4 million a week, which means a £58 million deficit every year.

    "The three years is up and now we are having to live with the consequences. Yet the government still refuses to admit this is the real reason. Perhaps their explanation got lost in the post?"

    Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party said, "Why should we have to go to Brussels to beg permission to fund a service which is important to so many local communities; especially in rural areas? In spite of Alastair Darling declaring investment of £1.7 billion, he will still have to ask permission from the EU to do this.

    "Thanks to the EU, the profitable services have been 'cherry-picked' whilst the small and rural post offices will get cut or axed.

    "It's about time we stamped on the power of the European Union if we are going to address the problems facing postal services: they have consistently failed to deliver."

    Treaty of Amsterdam , Article 88 demands that a national government seeks permission from the Commission to grant state aid.

    EU Directive 2002/39/EC requires permission before any state aid can be granted.

    The Postal Services Directive 2002/39/EC reduced the part of the postal market which could be reserved for the national monopoly

    UK Independence Party: The only Party telling you the truth about the European Union
    Privacy Statement and Terms of use (including use of content) All work © 2006 UKIP and other contributors

    Wednesday, December 13, 2006

    56% of Scottish people and Sir Martin Sorrell


    Just returned from a breakfast briefing. The guest speaker was Sir Martin Sorrell of WPP.

    He highlighted some corporate issues in his 25- minute talk. These ranged from international trade to Corporate Social Responsibility and the democratizing effect of the Internet.

    One of the most thought-provoking comments he made was how, in his view, Britain was now back to 1984. Not in the Orwellian sense but the numbers of those employed in public service. He explained that at present a staggering 56% of Scottish people are employed by the Government.

    Friday, December 08, 2006

    PEACE OIL

    Pity this isn't aired in the media.........................


    Peace Oil is produced in Israel by Jews, Arabs, Druze and Bedouin working together. Grown in the foothills of the Carmel Mountains, the olives are pressed within hours of picking, to produce this prize winning extra virgin olive oil.

    An initiative of registered UK charity The Charities Advisory Trust, Peace Oil encourages co-operation between communities. By helping to market their produce it hopes to bring economic prosperity to such enterprises, encouraging others to follow their example.

    Profits from Peace Oil are used to support peace and reconciliation work in the Middle East.

    www.peaceoil.org

    Peace Oil
    Radius Works
    Back Lane
    London
    NW3 1HL
    0207 435 6500

    Thursday, November 23, 2006

    "it's just a bird"

    Brilliant post by the Devil.

    I suppose one day, the people that come to live here will abide by our rules.

    Wednesday, November 15, 2006

    UKIP on the way up?

    The Devil highlights a brilliant media coup for the United Kingdom Independence Party.

    Sunday, November 12, 2006

    Europe must be destroyed!

    No, not a Dalek rant but some words of wisdom from Tim Worstall's excellent blog and endorsed by the Devil himself

    Latin You Can Use. (from a post in October 2004)

    A phrase that we all need to learn, one that can unite us as Europeans in defence of our freedoms, lives, rights and properties while ending the rise of a faceless bureaucracy over us.

    "Ceterum censeo Consilium Europaeum esse delendam"

    And, therefore, I conclude that "the European Union must be destroyed".


    Tuesday, October 31, 2006

    "Spooks" on BBC last night

    Melanie Phillips wrote this article following last week's episode.............

    The British Bigotry Corporation

    Although I didn’t see it, a number of people have reported that the BBC TV series ‘Spooks’ has been a sickening example of sheer unadulterated antisemitism, complete with conspiracy theory and accusations of dual loyalty. A reader writes:

    Anti-Zionism may be unremarkable on the Beeb, but this skidded well over into antisemitism. The take-home message was that Al Qaeda are a bunch of amateurs and can be managed as a law-enforcement problem but the real danger are those devious, murderous, all-too-clever Jews. The main plot involves a group of ruthless Mid-East hijackers who take over a London embassy and shoot people every hour. They turn out (of course) to be Jews in disguise. We have a Jewish traitor in high places with dialogue invoking the classic ‘can’t serve two masters’ accusation: ‘I asked which side he would fight on in a war between Britain and Israel. He just gave me his answer.’ The plot also relies on the same argument as the 9/11 conspiracy theory that Mossad blew up the twin towers because Muslims aren’t smart enough: MI5 realise the baddies must be Jewish because they’re too clever for their own good (and merciless and self-serving, naturally). The Jews in this episode may not be drinking the blood of Christian children but they are certainly bloodthirsty. There is even a fat, heavy-featured Mossad officer looking evil and inscrutable as he mouths ’shalom’. Plus the ringleader gets a cathartic booting at the end from the hero which had me in mind of Kristallnacht.

    Nor was this a one-off rush of blood to the BBC head. Eric Lee, who wrote about this double episode on his blog
    here was forced to return to it again here, since ‘Spooks’ has now used the ‘diabolical Israelis’ angle three weeks in a row. Are they really so short of plot ideas?
    Only a few days ago, people were taken aback to read the brazen admissions of bias made by BBC bigwigs at their ‘impartiality’ seminar. But this is much more than political bias. This is deep, culturally embedded, venomous bigotry. Yet to my knowledge there has been no inquest at the BBC, no expressions of concern by staff, no sign of life from the Governors. Astounding.


    What does one expect from the institutionally anti-semitic, anti-Zionist BBC?

    Last night, "Israelis" were once again in a bizarre story-line. This time a supposed Mossad hit squad went after this weeks "Baddie". The "Baddie" got wasted, much to the annoyance of MI5 who couldn't tolerate such interference from a foreign power. Bless.

    I wonder if the Devil cares about this?

    Wednesday, October 25, 2006

    Bulgarians & Romanians

    The comment by Serf in his Blog is self-evident and more than worthy of a mention.

    Here it is in full:
    Wednesday, October 25, 2006

    Tough on Immigration

    Our Glorious Leader, in the knowledge that his lies on immigration have been rumbled, has vowed to be much tougher this time. His tame Pit Bull has been telling the world that Romanians and Bulgarians, will not have the automatic right to work in the UK next year, unlike their more fortunate Polish counterparts. Thats the theory anyway. The reality?

    EU law means the Government can’t stop people coming – so permits will only drive people into the illegal economy.Read that carefully. Under EU law, all Romanians and Bulgarians have the right to come to the UK. The system to be put in place simply means that they cannot work legally. So my question to you is this: A Bulgarian who has been unable to find a job at home is now faced with an option

    1. Stay where he is unemployed
    2. Come to the UK and work illegally

    Personally I would choose option number two.
    Something which not enough people are aware of is exactly what free movement of people means. Open Europe spells out one very big problem with it:

    While EU law allows the Government to restrict numbers coming to work for companies in the UK it currently forbids it from stopping dangerous criminals from entering the country, or deporting them if they commit a crime in the UK.

    Seeing as crooks have more reason than most to wish to move around, this part of the law is a complete criminals charter. Probably in place to make a power grab in the area of justice much easier.

    Thursday, October 19, 2006

    Following the BA crucifix affair.....................

    Overheard in a hospital earlier today:
    Question: "Are you married?"
    Old gentleman patient: "Sadly, yes."
    Question: "Do you have any religion?"
    Old gentleman patient: "No. I'm Church of England."


    And he was not joking, our informant insists.



    (Taken from the brilliant Samizdata Blog)

    Monday, October 02, 2006

    Iain Dale on Radio 4

    Political blogger, Iain Dale on Radio 4 this morning said that the Conservatives had to offer the electorate something different at the next election.

    He was responding to the would-be Chancellor, George Osborne, who said ( and I'm paraphrasing here) "it would be irresponsible of me to say that a new Conservative Government would immediately introduce tax cuts". The only thing he didn't say was prudent.

    Look 'ere Georgie boy, if you want to get elected in 2008/9 start distancing your party from the wishy-washy, federalist, PC agenda of the Lib/Lab alliance. Or do you want DC to be leader of Blue Labour as you a rightly referred to in certain circles.

    Thursday, September 14, 2006

    Battle of Britain Day - September 15th

    In a few minutes it'll be Battle of Britain Day. In my opinion this ought to be made a Bank Holiday along with October 21st, Trafalgar Day. Notwithstanding the arguments a few weeks ago about the importance of the "few", September 15th, 1940 remains an important day in this islands great history.

    There's a service of rememberance at Westminster Cathedral on Sunday.