Thursday, March 29, 2007

Sir Martin Sorrell (3)

Posted this about Sir Martin recently.

And the defamation case in which Sir Martin was awarded £100000 in damages finished yesterday and for some reason today's Times Online appears to have a bit of a dig. Is it their general view about these types of cases, or the huge legal bills that both sides will have to cough up?


James Higham said...

What was it about, Jeremy? Or is that sub judice?

Jeremy Jacobs said...

no not at all. Details of the case are at the Times.